Dickies Mens Redhawk Action Work Trousers Navy Blue 48" Waist & 29" Leg
Dickies Mens Redhawk Action Work Trousers Navy Blue 48" Waist
Features Button and zip fastening Zipped hand pockets One zipped thigh pocket Two zipped back pockets External knee pad pouchesFabric Material 65% polyester, 35% cotton, 260gsm...
Dickies Mens Redhawk Action Work Trousers Navy Blue 48 Waist and 29 Leg gets 3.5 out of 5 based on 7 ratings
No further specification information available
Price on the up? Buy today! Follow the Price History for dickies mens redhawk action work trousers navy blue 48 waist and 29 leg
Rating | Comments |
---|---|
Good Quality, Terrible Sizing By: Andrew Wu, on February 27, 2018 Pros: Cons: "The actual quality of the cargos seem great and I'm not surprised since they're Dickies. However the sizing is extremely off. My waist is less than 36" so I ordered 36". They are far too large on the waist and can't be worn without a belt. Thigh part of the trousers are extremely tight so if anyone trains their legs in the gym, these won't work comfortably. |
|
Odd fit/sizing By: Neilo, on December 4, 2017 Pros: Cons: "I normally wear jeans in a size 32W 34L so ordered these in a 32T size. The waist was about right. Legs close enough to get away with. But the rest of the sizing seems a bit odd. I think I could have comfortably got both of my legs into one. Far too baggy for me so I sent them back. Shame as the material seemed as though it would have been very hard wearing. |
|
A Trousers length!!!. By: Amazon Customer, on September 29, 2017 Pros: Cons: "Was apprehensive about the the leg length. It was stated as short . Took a gamble that they would fit. Must have been a 30 inch & not a 29 inch leg as they were a tad too long. Ok if I pull them up at the waist. Overall am happy with the trousers . Should last a while, sturdy material. No need for knee pads pockets. Waist size was spot on. Not sure how they wash yet, or iron, fingers crossed.. |
|
Great workwear trousers By: Amazon Customer, on May 11, 2017 Pros: Cons: |
|
Good By: tvas, on February 12, 2017 Pros: Cons: |
|
pocket problems By: fraser, on December 7, 2012 Pros: Cons: |
|
Poor By: Graeme, on December 9, 2011 Pros: Cons: |